Offering · Agent build

Agents for real work, with clear limits and ownership.

We build an agent for one workflow inside the systems you already run, with clear operating limits, traceable decisions and a structured handover. Your business and control owners set the limits and retain the decisions that carry risk.

Call when

  • You know the workflow and want it running, with controls.
  • A pilot has passed and needs a governed release.
  • You want one pattern your teams can reuse for the next agent.

You get

  • A released agent for one workflow, with a named owner and enforced limits.
  • Evaluation on your own cases and a release gate someone can stop.
  • A request trace for every step and the cost per completed task.
  • Runbooks, training and redesigned roles, with your team operating it.

How it runs

Length
8 to 16 weeks per release, after the workflow is chosen and proved.
You bring
The workflow owner, the people who do the work, a technical lead and the control owners.
It ends with your decision
Release by release: expand, change course or stop.
Fee
Fixed fee per phase, stated in a written proposal before you commit.

What you see in production

A trace for each material step. A named owner for each consequential decision.

An agent prepares, checks and drafts. When it acts for a person, it reads only what that person may see; when it runs in the background, it works under its own approved identity and scope. Either way it acts only within limits an owner set, and hands anything uncertain to a person with the reason stated.

The record behind each step shows the data it used, how current that data was, the version that ran and who approved the result. That is what your risk, finance and operations teams will ask for.

Claims preparation agent 1.1.0Synthetic reference example
OwnerClaims operations
MayPrepare assigned case
May notSearch prior claims, write, decide or pay
  • REQ-C-1042-01: packet preparedProcedure version 5 · status as of 19 October, 09:05 EDT
    Examiner reviews
  • REQ-F04: current status cannot be established09:00 snapshot cannot establish the 09:15 hold · packet withheld
    Manual preparation
  • Prior-claims history remains heldevidence/claims-release-v2 · no note or payment tool
    Scope restricted
Invented teaching records, not live activity or measured results. Inspect the version 1.1.0 release decision.

Follow one governed request

The controls travel with the work.

Select a step to see what the system checks and what evidence remains. The example is a claims-preparation request; the same pattern applies to other governed workflows.

Selected stage

Establish the request context

Identify the person, role, channel, workflow purpose and case. If an agent is acting in the background, use its registered workload identity and approved scope.

Evidence retainedUser and agent identity, purpose, case ID and request time.

Insurance

Claims, underwriting and service, with examiners and underwriters in charge.

Insurers hold the context an examiner or underwriter needs, but it sits in several systems and a procedure library. These agents assemble it and cite it.

Claims case preparation

Prepares assigned-case status, events, parties and the applicable procedure for examiner review. The worked example is synthetic and read-only.

  • Gathers context within the assigned case; prior-claims history is held
  • Shows source versions, applicability and freshness
  • Creates a cited packet; no internal-note drafting or writes
People decide
Claims professionals retain coverage, payment and escalation decisions. The agent never approves, denies or pays.
Evidence you keep
Sources, procedure version, as-of time and the examiner’s packet acceptance. Inspect the synthetic workflow and release decision.

Underwriting submission intake

Reads broker submissions, extracts the exposures and checks them against appetite before an underwriter opens the file.

  • Extracts fields with the page they came from
  • Flags missing information and drafts the request to the broker
  • Routes out-of-appetite risks with the rule that applied
People decide
Underwriters decide appetite, terms and price, and approve every message to the broker.
Evidence you keep
Extracted values with their source, the appetite rule version and the underwriter’s decision.

Policy service requests

Prepares routine changes such as address, payment or beneficiary updates, and checks the documents and authority behind each one.

  • Matches the request to the policy and the requester’s authority
  • Checks the documents the procedure requires
  • Prepares the change for one-click review
People decide
The service team approves each change. Anything unusual goes to a person with the reason stated.
Evidence you keep
The request, the checks performed, the documents relied on and who approved.

Banking

Reviews and memos prepared to the standard examiners expect.

Bank analysts spend much of a review gathering and reconciling records before any judgment starts. These agents do the gathering and leave the judgment where it belongs.

Periodic customer review preparation

Assembles the records, screening results and changes since the last review into a draft file for the analyst.

  • Collects customer, account and screening data in one place
  • Highlights what changed since the last review
  • Drafts the review narrative with citations
People decide
Analysts decide the risk rating and any escalation. The agent cannot close a review.
Evidence you keep
Every record used, its as-of date, the draft version and the analyst’s sign-off.

Credit memo drafting

Pulls financial statements, exposure and covenant history into the bank’s memo template, so credit officers review analysis instead of assembling it.

  • Spreads financials from approved sources
  • Checks covenants and flags breaches or near misses
  • Drafts memo sections with each figure traced to its source
People decide
Credit officers and committees decide. The agent recommends nothing it cannot trace.
Evidence you keep
Source tables, calculation versions and reviewer changes to each section.

Finance and operations

Agents that work the numbers between month ends.

Any firm with time, billing or a close can use these, from professional services to portfolio companies.

Work in progress and billing

Watches unbilled work against thresholds the business and finance agreed, and does the routine follow-up when one is crossed.

  • Alerts the engagement leader when WIP is too high or too low
  • Checks for missing or miscoded time before raising a shortfall
  • Drafts the billing request for approval
People decide
Leaders and finance decide. The agent cannot issue an invoice or change a budget.
Evidence you keep
The data each alert used, its as-of time, and the owner and version of each threshold.

Close and exception queues

Sorts the queue so routine items are prepared and only true exceptions reach a controller, with the reason stated.

  • Matches items against the agreed rules
  • Explains why each exception was raised
  • Measures review effort and time to resolve
People decide
Controllers decide every exception and approve rule changes.
Evidence you keep
Rule version, matched records and the reviewer’s outcome for every item.

Growth and portfolio companies

Fast results for lean teams, without skipping the controls.

Smaller firms need the same owner, limits and evidence, delivered in weeks and run by a small team.

Order status and credit holds

Answers customer questions about where an order is and why it is held, so service agents stop searching three systems.

  • Finds order, shipment and credit status in one view
  • Explains a hold in plain language with its source
  • Routes exceptions to credit with the context attached
People decide
Credit releases holds. Service agents choose what to tell the customer.
Evidence you keep
Each answer with the records behind it and who acted on it.

Account briefings

Prepares a one-page briefing before a customer call from the CRM, open tickets, orders and recent correspondence.

  • Summarizes the account’s recent history and open issues
  • Lists commitments made and still outstanding
  • Respects each user’s access to the underlying records
People decide
The account owner decides what to raise and what to promise.
Evidence you keep
The sources behind each briefing and when they were read.

These are examples of the agents and patterns we build, not client case studies.

How an agent reaches production

Approve the whole system, not the model.

The model is one component among the data it reads, the tools it can call, the identity it acts under and the people who rely on it. We approve that whole composition for a stated scope.

A change to any part, a new source, a new tool or a new model version, can change what was approved, so it goes back through the gate.

Where AI should not act

Decide how much the agent may do before you decide what to build.

Two questions set the bound for each task: what an error would cost, and how much human judgment the task requires. Each quadrant carries a control, agreed with the business owner before release.

Review every timeAI prepares; a person approvesFinancial reports, claim payments, filingsControl: an approval gate before any actionPeople decideAI may supply cited evidence onlyHiring and dismissal, ethical calls, crisesControl: no agent authority to actAutomate and monitorAI handles it, with checksTranscription, summaries, formatting, routingControl: monitoring and sampled reviewAI as a first draftAI starts; people refineEmails, briefs, brainstorming, first researchControl: the person signs the resultCost of an errorHighLowHuman judgment requiredLowHigh
The cost of an error and the judgment required decide how much AI may do. Swipe sideways to see the whole drawing.

The quadrant follows the use, not the task type. A summary for an internal note and a summary placed in a medical, legal or customer file carry very different consequences, so classify the specific use before choosing the review.

Human judgment by design

Autonomy is not the goal. The outcome is.

Full autonomy is oversold. Human involvement is not a final approval click; it is designed in at three points and scaled to what an error would cost.

At design

People set the task, the sources the agent may use and the actions it may never take.

In operation

Owners watch for drift: a changed source, a superseded document still being retrieved, a rising rate of overrides.

At the moment of consequence

People step in where the cost of an error or the uncertainty of a decision calls for it.

Where the business is a human relationship, such as advice delivered by financial professionals, a fully autonomous agent is a change of business model, not a better workflow. We design those agents to strengthen the professional: preparing the conversation, servicing the account and following up on what was promised.

Agent authority

An agent earns authority one step at a time.

By default an agent gathers evidence and drafts. Next it proposes changes for an accountable owner to accept. It acts on its own only for a narrow action with independent authorization, tested preconditions and a way to recover. Some actions are never automatic.

1 Gather and draftDefaultCollect evidence; draft descriptions,candidate classifications andincident explanations2 Propose changesOwner reviewsA diff, its evidence, affectedconsumers and tests, for anaccountable owner to accept3 Execute a narrow actionEarnedIndependent authorization, testedpreconditions, bounded scopeand a recovery procedureAuthority grows only with evidenceNever automatic: weaken a policy, expand a purpose, merge identities, delete data, or approve its own suggestion.
Agent authority is earned one step at a time, and some actions are never automatic. Swipe sideways to see the whole drawing.

How it fits together

Three layers. People stay on top.

The agent works between your systems and the people who own the process. Nothing is ripped out: it uses the systems of record and data platform you already run, under its own identity and permissions.

AI-ready data foundation AI security and governance evidence

People

Owners, reviewers and operators

Set limits, approve what carries risk, redirect the work.

Agents

Prepare, check, draft, alert

Each with its own identity, tested before every release.

Your systems

Systems of record and data

Claims, policy, core banking, ERP, CRM, documents and your data platform.

Included with every agent

Six things a demonstration never has to show.

A named owner

One person answers for the result, its limits and when the agent may do more.

Limits enforced at the data

Answers come from approved, current sources, filtered by each user’s permissions before the model sees them.

Evaluation on your cases

Versioned test sets with pass thresholds, rerun whenever the model, data or procedure changes.

A release gate

A named person who can stop a release, and a failing test that proves the gate works.

The request trace

Who asked, under what authority, which sources and versions were used, and what came back.

An agent scorecard

Accuracy on your cases, how often people step in, escalations, drift and cost per completed task. Interventions should fall as trust is earned. A rising rate means the controls need attention; a rate near zero can mean nobody is really reviewing.

Read next: Worked guide: claims preparation Agent Onboarding Adoption by Design How we work

Next step

Bring one workflow. Leave with a plan.

A free sixty-minute session with Richard to examine one workflow, what is blocking it and whether there is a useful next step.